0-60 mph 2007 G35S vs 2017 GSF

952分

個人積分：952分

文章編號：74137726

Now I know why my GSF did 0-96 slower than I expected. That's because I need to turn off traction control. For my old Nissans TC on/off 0-96 time almost identical but for GSF TC on/off makes a little bit more difference.

https://www.edmunds.com/lexus/rc-f/2015/long-term-road-test/2015-lexus-rc-f-performance-tested.html

https://www.infinitiq50.org/forum/infiniti-q50-reviews/3721-first-real-review-edmunds.html

Of course just like my old Nissans my GSF will definitely be faster and faster in the future...

dlin4229

952分

樓主

dlin4229

個人積分：952分

文章編號：74579528

If you check the below links, you can find Porches are not particularly fast if TC is on!?! That's why I always feel they are not very fast on the road even comparing with my son's old 2007 G35S...

(I also tested Cayman S before and was NOT impressed at all!?! 滾來滾去

)

https://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/track-tests/2013-porsche-911-carrera-cabriolet-vs-2012-porsche-911-carrera-s-cabriolet-track-test.html

https://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/track-tests/track-tested-2012-porsche-911-carrera-s-pdk-vs-7-speed-manual.html

dlin4229

952分

樓主

dlin4229

個人積分：952分

文章編號：74607892

If you check the below links, you should find my GSF should be excellent in steering/handling performance even comparing with latest M5(F90) and Panamera.

Believe it or not. I DO love to drive my son's G35S(with PSS10, Eibach) more then GSF when driving on mountain roads. Of course G35S has much much stiffer ride...

https://www.edmunds.com/lexus/gs-f/2018/
https://www.edmunds.com/bmw/m5/
https://www.edmunds.com/porsche/panamera/

PS:
1. If you check tech category in GSF, you should find GSF score is very low in that category. I agree but I buy this car for driving performance. So it's totally fine for me.

In addition, its brake score is not very good, either but I think it should be 8.0. Anyway. GSF is not so fast, so...

2. Of course GSF unit body is very stiff (maybe even stiffer than GT-R). Just the design of its shock absorbers is not so good because the design of shock absorbers are more like ART than ENGINEERING, I think.

(Even GSF handling is very good but I still think M5 suspension is better than GSF and even GT-R!?! Similarly GSF is slow but its engine is better...)

dlin4229

952分

樓主

dlin4229

個人積分：952分

文章編號：74607944

I'm also very happy I didn't buy GT-R. GT-R is old now. I think GT-R handling/steering is NOT as good as the latest standard. In addition, its turbo technology is old style which is so so in low rpm and very good in high rpm. This means very good on race track but not so good on the street...

https://www.edmunds.com/nissan/gt-r/

PS: You may think GT-R handling is better than GSF. That's because GT-R suspension is stiffer. If I put Ohlins on my GSF, I think my GSF will be better...

(even comparing with much stiffer Nismo)

dlin4229

952分

樓主

dlin4229

個人積分：952分

文章編號：74662115

I think the best steering and handling big sedan should be CST-V. But its ride is quite stiff comparing with others. I think Edmunds really loves GSF. They think GSF has excellent steering/handling and also has very comfortable ride... (Yes! Toyota or Japanese cars are getting better and better!!!

)

https://www.edmunds.com/cadillac/cts-v/

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparison-test/a19459941/2018-bmw-m5-vs-cadillac-cts-v-mercedes-amg-e63-s-porsche-panamera-turbo-comparison-test/

Actually I don't like Car and Driver. I think their reviews are biased!?!