Euro-NCAP對於Suzuki Vitara有無自動煞停(AEB)的回覆

首先,感謝"帥鄉民"一直以來,投入大量對Vitara不能選配AEB的關心與"討論"

希望你未來能選到更安全的車。

最近在爭論的以下兩個問題:

1. Vitara沒有AEB時到底有沒有Euro-NCAP 5顆星?

2. AEB是否是5顆星的必要條件? (一開始帥鄉民說一定要有配備,後又改口得需為選配...)

在01上的唇槍舌戰,都沒有Euro-NCAP的回應來的令人信服吧?

因此本人以我的破英文,E-mail給Euro-NCAP詢問後得到以下回復

<此截圖為我的提問>
Euro-NCAP對於Suzuki Vitara有無自動煞停(AEB)的回覆

<此截圖為Euro-NCAP回信>
Euro-NCAP對於Suzuki Vitara有無自動煞停(AEB)的回覆

以上
正港的 NCAP 5顆星 大家還不下訂在等甚麼!
正港五顆星的車是不怕被質疑的 就算沒有主動安全 照樣拿五顆星

才是真正禁得起考驗的車阿

日後補上主動安全配備不就破五星了
打臉打到帥鄉民臉都飛啦,哈哈哈
果然Euro NCAP的回覆才是最有力的證據
小帥然 wrote:
哈哈,我就先不破艮了...(恕刪)

HRV5顆星又怎樣
國產又不是歐規怎麼比?
舉例子拜託舉個能看的
我只看到KONA 也是相同情況XD 5顆星
kurokawa079 wrote:
HRV5顆星又怎樣...(恕刪)


那就反請高手解釋一下星等評分條件 下圖跟台灣的資料那裡不同?

如果不同,應該也是五星吧, 那就快建議請車商打上證明讓鄉民都閉嘴不就好了嗎?

有二款車都拿五顆星 超威的 打上我幫你多推薦幾台銷量 說到做到


PS: Q:有人會去問EC的五星嗎? 為什麼不問? A:因為台官方XXXXXXXX.... 所以要問什麼?

Q:你說你拿五星,為什麼大家問? A:因為台官方XXXXXX.... 所以提出問題正常的



The five-star safety rating system continuously evolves as older technology matures and new innovations become available. This means that tests are updated regularly, new tests are added to the system and star levels adjusted. For this reason the year of test is vital for a correct interpretation of the car result.

The latest star rating is always the most relevant and comparing results over different years is only valid if the updates to the rating scheme were small. Recently, the inclusion of emerging crash avoidance technology has significantly altered the meaning of the stars.

From 2016, some cars have two star ratings. One rating is based on a car fitted only with safety equipment which is standard on every variant in the model range throughout EU28. This rating reflects the minimum level of safety you can normally expect from any car sold anywhere in the European Union. All cars assessed by Euro NCAP have this basic safety rating.
The second rating is based on a car with an additional ‘safety pack’, that may be offered as an add-on option to consumers. The additional safety equipment included in a safety pack will boost the car’s safety rating and, therefore, the second star rating demonstrates the safety level that the car can achieve if this additional equipment is included. Not every car has this second star rating, but when available, it helps consumers to easily understand the benefit of additional equipment expressed in extra stars.

The following provides some general guidance as to what safety performance the stars refer to in today's system:

5 stars safety:
Overall good performance in crash protection. Well equipped with robust crash avoidance technology

4 stars safety:
Overall good performance in crash protection; additional crash avoidance technology may be present

3 stars safety:
Average to good occupant protection but lacking crash avoidance technology
天災人禍我們避免不了,但車輛主被動安全,我們可以有選擇的權力!!!
aaaomc wrote:
The five-s...(恕刪)


......

應該給車商壓力..
逼其比照國外,給滿安全配備,(選配or訂製的方式..也可以)

其它進口車廠,百萬以下車款,也開始補上AEB了..
金鈴應該思考..怎麼給出安全配備更有競爭力的產品...
關閉廣告
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 31)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!