你說的對 wrote:
說過了,不再重複
載台是個問題,聲納是個問題,攻擊力是個問題
如果用到056來當反潛艦,共和國就危險了
054A才是好的載台,拉會去把直升機艙跟平台改一改,就很很夠用了
你要堅持056就堅持吧!
我說的是056/056A,講的是這整個系列。
而且也說過了不是靠這一型艦單打獨鬥而是作為反潛節點融入空海潛三位一體的反潛網。
2015:With fourth submarine-killer corvette China makes asw headway
詹士2017年分析解放軍海空反潛體系發展的專題文Undersea dragon Chinese ASW capabilities advance
你看文不認真這件事我不是第一天知道了。
有命算到沒命專家 wrote:
這是一魚二吃型船隻...(恕刪)
你這樣消費日本海自的大艦,會有人不高興的
mangchaocs wrote:
Hey, you don't really have to try so hard to show how "mouth canon" fits you by talking s**t.
You've already been certified, K?
Oh, God. Funny English again. Please speaking Mandarin.
What is your English level?CET-2 and CET-6 = CET-26
Do you ever learn grammar at school? not Gram-ma
Mouth canon What a Dumbo
How about "Mouth Howitzers", "Mouth Rocket", and "Mouth Mortar"?
Your English is so worse. Why you like to show your ignorance.
台灣向後退 wrote:
兄台,不要跟軍盲認真^++^
1300噸的反潛笑話大笑會信的就是笨蛋大笑
這些軍盲不知道,其實054A與056在共和國定位是就是當砲灰用的
真的打起仗,裝備和人都是拿來算交換比的,這世上還有戰時絕對不是炮灰的武器?
會思維落後到還抱有一款武器單打獨鬥的想法,所以你的ID總是跟你的發言那麼應景啊
2015:With fourth submarine-killer corvette China makes asw headway
不過在諸君眼中老共從來都沒做過什麼正確抉擇,所以056系列放在南海反潛這種事你們就當做是老共再再再再再一次的重大決策失誤吧
mangchaocs wrote:
Seriously? What a high level English education you've ever had would teach you to say "please speaking"?
You just want to kill me by cracking me up with nonsense hah?!
Made a typo. That's my fault. It should be " Please speak in Madarin"
How about your "a high level English education", "teach you to say"?Seriously?Totally Chinese style English, again
This sentence "What a high level English education you've ever had would teach you to say please speaking"? is totally wrong.
It should be
What the highest level English lessons you've ever finished would let you say "please speaking"
關閉廣告