In fact in my opinion these Japanese cars have better chassis and also stiffer body than German cars (they have to because of their weaker dampers) However good dampers are TOO IMPORTANT and cannot be IGNORED or SKIPPED...
dlin4229 wrote:
In fact in...(恕刪)
請問是用這種XADO嗎?
No. I use cheaper one. See the below link. The total is 27 ml. I usually use one half for my VQ35HR which oil capacity is 5.2 quarts. I think yours is better and also more expensive...

httpshttps://www.amazon.com/XADO-Engine-Additive-Revitalizant-blister/dp/B004TMM0FI://www.amazon.com/XADO-Engine-Additive-Revitalizant-blister/dp/B004TMM0FI

As I said, XADO may be not good for everyone. I'm NOT always right. I just share my experience here because I LOVE to talk about cars so much... Hope it can also work on you.
OK. I drove my wife's M today again. Guess what? I felt wife's M throttle response is as immediate as my son's G now. I really love the response. Especially during heavy traffic I need to keep close to the front car to prevent other cars from cutting in and also don't want to hit the brake. I think immediate throttle response + light weight pully can really help in this situation on very busy highways...

Now I think both G and M are better to drive than my new GSF on very busy highway with some traffic jams...

PS: I definitely will not put XADO in my new GSF until it becomes 10 year old or over 120k kms if XADO still doesn't blow G and M engines then...
Speaking about my wife's M. I always say that M's dampers are not so good, right? But in the previous video M is faster than E500 on racetrack. I also drove it on mountain roads. I think its springs are stiff enough... So today I decided not to complain its dampers but chose to trust M's capability. Guess what? Wow!!! It's so fun to drive...

Yes. Its dampers don't give you enough confidence but if you choose to trust M, I think you still can make it... Actually M is so capable... (However, your passengers may not feel as happy as you...)
I also think M and G's driver view in front is very good which lets me control the car more easily on narrow streets and busy highways.

GSF's is also good but M and G's even better... I think these Japanese cars are really designed for Aisa crowded traffic and narrow mountain roads, not for high speed autobahn... such as drivers usually sit a little higher and spring rates are higher... (because higher spring rate may cause bouncy rides on high speed autobahn... That's why my GSF is more bouncy than M5 on highways... but higher spring rates provide more fun on mountain roads!!!)

PS: GSF is also good on high speed autobahn but M5 is even better...
Like many reviews the below video shows GSF is very capable on mountain roads comparing with CTS-V, M5, etc....

文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!