關閉廣告
myclie wrote:
我看無忌那邊與GM14的對比測試,它實際未修正可達到12mm,14mm是修正後的實際廣度。
底下是國外用戶的review, 跟Samyang 14mm去比對
Canon RF 14-35mm F4L IS USM Review
他的結論:實際修正後的廣度可能不足14mm, 而是比較像15mm
The heavy need for corrections also plays a bit of havoc with the focal length. On paper, the 14-35L is actually bit wider than the Samyang AF 14mm F2.8 prime lens which I used for comparison as it is the only other RF mount 14mm lens I had on hand. I put both lenses on a tripod and shot a brick wall scene to test width. Sure enough, the uncorrected image from the RF 14-35L is wider, though with some major problems, as you can see.
But I grabbed the corrected JPEGs from both lenses, and found, unsurprisingly, that now the Samyang’s image was actually wider. There are blocks showing on Samyang image (right) that are completely clipped off on the Canon’s image. I would say the corrected image from the Canon probably behaves more like a 15mm lens. I have to confess that all of this definitely bugged me on lens priced at $1700 in the US and $2250 here in Canada.
^^A 請多多指教~
MUS wrote:
底下是國外用戶的review...(恕刪)
這位攝影師拍的還真是不錯,他最後的結論其實也蠻肯定這個鏡頭,話說回來,我覺得沒有面面俱到的鏡頭,14-35在輕量化、儘可能延伸焦段增加方便性、畫質夠好夠銳利,近攝增加了創作性等等,再加上canon對色彩的演譯,這個鏡頭還是蠻好的,當然價錢的確不優,不過我準備去買一隻來用看看。
在數位化的時代,我覺得真的不用太在意數位修正,數位修正也是廠商的實力,能修正到讓人滿意的照片,也沒有不好,這也是手機取代了相機的一部份原因,現在相機的優勢還在大光圈、超廣角、長焦等方面,這是手機沒辦法取代的,出門帶著較輕便的全幅超廣角、中長焦,加上手機,旅行的裝備就齊全了,不是嗎?
關閉廣告