htc商務機很強,企業員工如果可以選會選什麼呢


BOA0803 wrote:
話說這三個天兵不是要...(恕刪)


就叫做"小唬隊"好了

唬爛的唬

joekickass wrote:
HTC商務哪裡強?? 除了可以裝"快樂軟體"外, 目前比起iPhone還有一大段差距, 主要是軟體與更新度, HTC再怎麼去補Android系統的不足, 還是有限...

只能選一隻手機的話, 這個階段我個人也還是選iPhone


看來你是沒有真正使用過現版本的HTC Sense, 本人用的是Desire HD Official 2.2.1., 亦曾擁有iPhone 3GS (iOS 4)

首先, 大家先別提原機以外的App, 只比較內置的電郵軟件, 因為商用來說, 重點關心的不外乎是電郵.

1. Email Priority
iPhone的內置電郵, 我找爆頭也找不到如何修改我將要發出電郵的Priority (High, Normal, Low), HTC Sense卻輕而易舉, 須知我那個電郵真的很重要呢~

2. Attachment
iPhone的電郵到底如何加入多過一個的附件呢? 話說我想將三幅jpg寄給他人, 但我亦找不到... 結果分三個電郵寄給別人, 或許是我手殘... 不該是很易用的嗎? 暫時我用HTC Sense沒此煩惱.

3. Email Format
iPhone在回覆別人寄來的HTML格式的電郵時, 「好像」能夠保留原來的格式樣子, 但一旦回覆過去, 實際上原來的本文的格式的行高, 字型上是有改變的... 只要你是收件者, 看上去是很明顯的.
HTC Sense所附的電郵, 同一情況, 原本格式是沒有改變的, 即對收件者來說, 你並沒有「滋擾」到他的原文.

不要說iPhone有的Email Thread, Single Inbox multi-account, HTC Sense通通做到.
HTC Sense的細節是迎合到商務工作的實際情況
1. 只看「未讀」的 (就是看我未看的電郵)
2. 只看「有標示」的 (就是要留意我準備要完成的事)
3. 只看「別人給我的會議請求」 (我有那個會議未回覆呢?)
4. 只看「有附件」的 (甲:「我寄了兩個電郵給你, 你要的東東就在包含了附件的那個」)

HTC Sense單單就可以在手機桌面的Widget上列出電郵, 一目了然~
iPhone!? 究竟手指要按多少次才找到我的電郵呢...?

軟體更新度??? 別給自己借口了... iOS所謂的更新為你帶來多少功能呢? 還是多數只令你重新等候JB呢? 給你一個令你提心吊胆的鬧鐘? 給你Game Center, Book Store, 讓你在這「商務」的世界中增強你的「工作」效率???

如果你說iPhone差價有賺來換HTC, 我贊成. 否則我還是建議你看看外面的世界吧

arthurlei wrote:
看來你是沒有真正使用...(恕刪)



無讚可按,真是字字珠璣,分析的鉅細靡遺XD

單就Mail這點來說,hTC Sence真的做得比iPhone好多了,當然,其他android系統的mail系統,我沒有用過無從比較,單就我姊姊與我的Mail使用經驗上來說,我比較喜歡HTC

至於朋友最近要買智慧手機,小弟推薦都先問需求開始,玩樂、殺時間,我就會推薦iPhone,所以我姊姊才買了蘋果,對小弟來說,研究擴充性與不死板的android,我會覺得更有不同的樂趣(比方找個不一樣的lock widget、換個不一樣風格的launcher),但比起玩樂性質,無庸置疑,我覺得蘋果做得比較好,至少在流暢度方面,以及遊戲多寡性與完整度,我覺得蘋果較占優勢。
joekickass wrote:
HTC商務哪裡強??...(恕刪)


希望出來說明一下那巨大的差距,不要射後不理喇叭王
時間拖越久,越覺得只是胡扯然後趕快跑去收集資料
Hmmm..說到這個,我相信Android系統的電子郵件比iPhone強多了。

問題是我需要的GTD軟體,Android Market上真的是找不太到,iPhone上就有Thing, OmniFocus, Taska,而且每個都很不錯,說到商用我還是很懷念以前Palm四大天王的時代就是了,目前看起來不論Palm和Android這點都是不行的。

至於為什麼商用這麼多人選iPhone,價值比較高是誘因,但是這說明了另一件事,大部分的人寧可有一些不方便,還是選iPhone,即使他的電郵或其他功能比不上Android,因為一天到晚要看行事曆和郵件的人其實沒有想像中的多,大部分的人都是能看就好。

講白一點,這年頭需要行事曆和電子郵件功能很強的人真的不多啦,不是每個人都一分鐘幾百萬上下啊..

說真的
該公司為什麼不再用黑莓,看來日後堪憂

而htc商務那麼強
android市佔率那麼高
為什麼?為什麼?
2000名企業員工9成以上選iphone
6%選android(HTC是大咖之一)

前天在ipad上看了星際大戰
尤達大師昨晚托夢告訴我
因為一般人很愛iphone但是有點貴
所以預算考量下當然會有些人買不下手
報公司的,當然就買最好的

尤達大師還告訴我買台華為小海豚3000~4000
配上ipad,才14000
有android 有ipad
竟然還比htc I.S便宜

以上是尤達大師托夢給我的
android3000多就有2.2的可以玩,超棒的
順便推薦一下華為s7
1g cpu 7吋多點觸控可打電話 9900
超棒的
g8J wrote:
說真的該公司為什麼不...(恕刪)


您總算回應了
英文很強的您...
看來對新聞原始來源的本意並不"強"喔

退回.........麻煩您再用功

http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9215598/Clorox_cleans_out_BlackBerries_in_favor_of_iPhones_Android_devices
Clorox cleans out BlackBerries in favor of iPhones, Android devices

Apple iPads are growing in popularity among workers, but IT managers are slow to embrace them

Computerworld - SANTA CLARA, Calif. -- When Ralph Loura took over as CIO of Clorox a year ago, the company was standardized on clunky Windows 2000 desktop computers and Blackberry mobile phones.

"Employee satisfaction with the IT team was not great," he said during a keynote speech yesterday at the SNW conference here.

"If you believe demographic studies, the workforce in their 20s and 30s isn't going to accept black corporate PCs with black corporate mobile phones and not be allowed to run Facebook or Angry Bird apps," he said.

Loura was among many CIOs and IT managers at SNW who said they're facing the same issue -- employees want to use mobile technology at work, leaving IT with the job of ensuring that the devices and the data on them remain secure.

For Loura, that meant revamping the company's IT infrastructure while leveraging public and private clouds whenever possible.

The effort to enable a more mobile workforce becomes more a challenge at a company -- like Clorox -- whose 8,300 person workforce is split evenly between "information" workers and plant workers.

Loura so far has replaced 6,000 desktop and tower computers with lightweight HP laptops, and got rid of company-issued Blackberries while letting workers choose between an iPhone or Android or Window Phone 7-powered smartphone. The company has issued 2,000 smartphones, 92% of which are iPhones. About 6% of the smartphones chosen were Android-based while 2% were Windows Phone 7 devices.

"We live in public cloud for mail and messaging. I don't have to worry about security because I don't sync data to the iPhones. It remains in the cloud," he said.

"My job is about how to be the chief risk officer, yet provide choice and flexibility. It's about putting apps and logistics in the cloud and pushing the user interface to the edge," Loura continued.

Loura said a select group of employees is piloting a small number of iPads. While he's yet to find anyone who has said "take my laptop and replace with iPad," Loura does believe the tablet can eventually run business applications from the cloud.

"What I want [to do is] figure out how to take that business intelligence app or workflow app and figure out way to have it be accessed in an intuitive way from the iPad," he said.

Loura is not alone working to allow a self-reliant workforce to pick and choose the tools with which they want to work. As he sees it, his job is get his IT shop out of the way, without putting the company's data at risk.

Richard Rothschild, senior director IT and facilities at DVR-maker TiVo, also gives free rein to employees when it comes to mobile devices.

"I get a big benefit when I can use my mobile phone to see e-mail and be able to respond more quickly. I can approve things going into production faster instead of me having to find a computer and log in," he said. "The problem is protecting our intellectual property."

Rothschild said his company only allows workers to use phones that IT can control and wipe of data if they're lost or an employee leaves the company.

"We have a very large amount of data that's very sensitive to our customers," said David Davies, CIO at Flight Options, a private jet transportation company.

Even so, Davies said his company issued Blackberries to all of its employees in 2001 and 2002. The result was immediate, the company saved $8,000 in the first month in long distance phone bills.

Prior to using smartphones, Flight Options pilots and crew had to file details about how much aircraft maintenance, fuel consumption, miles flown per day, and any schedule deviations due to late passengers via fax to dispatchers. With the mobile phones, that information is sent cheaply and instantly.

Along with the mobile phones, Davies deployed a mobile device manager server to track the applications used on mobile devices, to inventory phones and wipe their data if they're lost.

Davies is currently rolling out iPads to his employees. The hope is that pilots and crewmembers will figure out ways to use them for myriad applications, such as downloading weather charts and passenger information.

"We'll have 20 iPads out there in the next six months and I need a way to manage them," he said.

Charles_Evo wrote:
您總算回應了英文很強...(恕刪)


我只想問你
為什麼92%選iphone
你會不會想太多了
其中幾個人看法可以取代其他92%的人的想法嗎
g8J wrote:
我只想問你為什麼92...(恕刪)


我只想問你,我們講這些,你這位自己口中說的3C白痴又聽不懂

幹麻來浪費彼此的時間,一個3C白痴自己都不了解的事,還引文過來

這不是來亂嗎????不要再來亂了啦~~先提升一下你自己的水知識脫離 3C 白痴的階段好嗎? 3C白痴!!
關閉廣告
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 8)

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!