看了一下二手及全新的公水貨價格，發現二手公司貨有些價格和全新水貨很接近
想請問一下各位的意見，買水貨會比較好嗎？還是公司貨比較有保障！！？？
最近賣掉手邊的相機，想換X100
看了一下二手及全新的公水貨價格，發現二手公司貨有些價格和全新水貨很接近
想請問一下各位的意見，買水貨會比較好嗎？還是公司貨比較有保障！！？？
看了一下二手及全新的公水貨價格，發現二手公司貨有些價格和全新水貨很接近
想請問一下各位的意見，買水貨會比較好嗎？還是公司貨比較有保障！！？？
個人積分：5分
文章編號：39915457
個人積分：24分
文章編號：39916189
個人積分：0分
文章編號：39916473
個人積分：5分
文章編號：39918993
個人積分：118分
文章編號：39919771
I just found out that X100 has an issue called 'Sticky Shuttle Blade', when use Av mode, the shuttle was unable to close as properly causing photo over-exposed. This is real. I was about to purchase a used X100 in Taipei till I find out during testing, this issue.
An used X100, if it is from company and within warranty, you can get this fixed easily. Actually, the entire lens has to be replaced. According to website, 2% of all X100 is affected, I am not too sure this claim to be true or not. Fuji knows this problem, and it occurs during the earthquake time when they start to pull back production. Apparently, they are replacing it with a brand new modified design, that worries me. It is not that it will happen or not, but when, I think. Someone said, production date after Q4 2011 should solve this problem. If you want to buy a parallel import, make sure you check the date to see.
I am seriously considering a proper company version of X100. I am not too sure with the fix (replacing an entire lens unit inside the camera) is something parallel import can perform. If you pick up a used company X100, best for you to make sure you test them properly and the warranty is still valid, else, you would be heading for disaster.
Fuji really need to think hard about its quality control. This made in Japan is totally BS in my opinion.
個人積分：5分
文章編號：39922670
個人積分：7分
文章編號：39929354
個人積分：118分
文章編號：39930115
個人積分：56分
文章編號：39930704
個人積分：5分
文章編號：39941304
關閉廣告