繁體中文版維基百科-HDI
英文版維基百科-HDI
仔細看一下中文版第18名是中華民國
但是英文版的卻消失了
連圖片上都是無資料狀態
這不是政治議題
而是台灣怎麼能夠在這樣的指標上沒有資料
請各位看得懂英文以及會編輯維基百科的大大們一起讓台灣出現在英文版上吧!
個人積分：0分
文章編號：25735249
個人積分：7分
文章編號：25735285
個人積分：132分
文章編號：25735321
個人積分：0分
文章編號：25735521
但我前幾天試著加入台灣
後來又被復原
他說了下面這段話
Hello, thank you for your contribution to our article Human Development Index. I've just seen that User:77.83.246.178 has reverted your version. Your source really states that ROC is 18th, hence ROC's HDI is ranked just after Iceland's HDI of 0.869 and just before Belgium's HDI of 0.867; However, unfortunately, your source does not state what ROC's HDI is. Note that ROC's HDI (ranked as 18th) may also be 0.867, i.e. like Belgium's HDI, or 0.869, i.e. like Iceland's HDI, just as Sweden and Germany have the same HDI (0.885) - although Sweden is ranked above Germany (because all HDIs are presented by rounded figures only, while the exact HDI - having 6 digits after the decimal point - shows that Sweden's HDI is higher than Germany's HDI). Here is another problem: you have presented ROC's HDI in 2010 HDR section, as if ROC's HDI appears in 2010 HDR, althought ROC's HDI was calculated independently by ROC. You can still fix the problem by giving a better source (with ROC's HDI and not only with ROC's rank), and by splitting ROC's HDI from the HDIs presented in 2010 HDR section. Good luck. Eliko (talk) 18:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
上面是不是沒有說到要是聯合國會員才能寫上去呢?
我英文不是很好
不知道有沒有看錯
個人積分：0分
文章編號：25737436
1. 雖然您所提供的資料指出台灣排名18, 卻沒有說出台灣切確HDI數字是多少.
(However, unfortunately, your source does not state what ROC's HDI is)
2. 您提供的資料中台灣的HDI是由台灣自己算出的, 可能需要提供更好的第三方資料來佐證.
(...ROC's HDI was calculated independently by ROC. You can still fix the problem by giving a better source (with ROC's HDI and not only with ROC's rank))
僅供參考, 如錯請幫忙指正。感謝
個人積分：4分
文章編號：25740870
個人積分：6分
文章編號：25740942
個人積分：7分
文章編號：25741060
個人積分：38分
文章編號：25742717
關閉廣告