話說之前我去一位發燒友家買他的McIntosh C2600. 結果看到他家有三套擴大機組 McIntosh C2600+MC452, C2700+MC462, Pass Labs INT 30A. 當他聽到我的後級用的是MC402時,他就直言MC402速度很慢,然後就不再繼續講下去。說實在我不了解他説的是不是指MC402反應速度慢。但我平常聽音樂(以電影配樂為主)用現在的系統聽(B&W 802D2+C2600+MC402+Marantz SA11S2),除了我覺得解析不太好之外,其它也沒有覺得什麼不妥。MC402感覺上推力也夠推802D2。試著上網找資料看看,也真查不到什麼叫速度慢和它的影響。說明書上也找不到量化的數據。但是那個速度慢的雜念不時就浮現。本想找一台中古的MC452,不過之前有一台中古市場只出現二、三天就很快被買走。結果現在中古上出現二套Mono後級求售:McIntosh MC601和Burmester 911 Mk2. 二套二手價差不多(~10,000Eur)且評價都不錯。個人比較傾向911 mk2,因為聽說Burmeister解析好,也可以換McIntosh以外的口味試試。但是又怕McIntosh前級和Burmester後級不搭(口袋太淺能換後級已經是極限,沒有錢可再加一台Burmester前級了)。不知道前輩能不能提供些意見供我參考。謝謝。
https://www.audioaficionado.org/showthread.php?t=10503
I thoroughly enjoy both amplifiers.
Obviously there'll be improvements with the MC452.
I felt the MC452 is a more dynamic amplifier. Slams very well, and very slightly quieter than the MC402.
The MC402 may seem more mid-range like. But I believe it's because of the wider contrast between the affecting frequencies. I would like to think that the MC452 is even more transparent, and I think that's how I would like to think Mc is striving - by perfecting the transparency (High Fidelity) in their gear, so that consumers can really enjoy the art of the producer's recording through science, and they have been doing a helluva job!
For the same price, I would go with the newer model.
However, I am very happy with the MC402, I wouldn't be changing it anytime soon. If I do, I would probably go for the MC1.2KW or the MC2KW (recently heard the MC2KW, and it is audio heaven!!!). If only I had more time to enjoy them!
我自己這兩台都沒聽過, 不過根據歷史事實, MC402是2002推出, 到了2010年時MC452推出, 然後MC402止售. 所以你覺得呢?

為提供您更優質的服務,本網站使用cookies。若您繼續瀏覽網頁,即表示您同意我們的cookies政策。 了解隱私權條款