淡水河邊的貝殼 wrote:
不曉得一些車款後霧燈超刺眼的是為啥?...(恕刪)

後霧燈的作用就是要讓後車在視線不良時能夠遠遠地就發現本車啊。

不過一般後霧燈的亮度就跟煞車燈一樣,
刺眼是正常,但若是超刺眼...就是問車主有沒有自己亂改裝了吧。

frogchen wrote:
為了分辨車頭or車尾
所以 後霧燈都設計成單邊...(恕刪)

...再怎麼樣都不會因為亮兩顆紅燈就把車尾誤認成車頭吧

難道你的頭燈還是前方向燈也是裝紅色燈泡的嗎??
來源: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_lighting#Rear_fog_lamps

Most jurisdictions permit rear fog lamps to be installed either singly or in pairs. If a single rear fog is fitted, most jurisdictions require it to be located at or to the driver's side of the vehicle's centreline — whichever side is the prevailing driver's side in the country in which the vehicle is registered.[17] This is to maximise the sight line of following drivers to the rear fog lamp. In many cases, a single reversing lamp is mounted on the passenger side of the vehicle, positionally symmetrical with the rear fog. If two rear fog lamps are fitted, they must be symmetrical with respect to the vehicle's centreline.[17] Proponents of twin rear fog lamps say two lamps provide vehicle distance information not available from a single lamp. Proponents of the single rear fog lamp say dual rear fog lamps closely mimic the appearance of illuminated stop lamps (which are mandatorily installed in pairs), reducing the conspicuity of the stop lamps' message when the rear fogs are activated. To provide some safeguard against rear fog lamps being confused with stop lamps, UN Regulation 48 requires a separation of at least 10 cm between the closest illuminated edges of any stop lamp and any rear fog lamp.[17]

dangermb wrote:
霧燈裝在右側我是贊同...(恕刪)


就說後霧燈是裝在駕駛者同側了,你還在那邊裝右側
閱讀能力有那麼差嗎

裝左側本來就較容易辨識超車距離
不然規定裝在駕駛人同側是規定個鳥
那後霧燈位置就隨便裝就好啦

還有,就知道這種視線不良還找死超車的言論會出現
好啦,我知道你很有品
當大霧中遇到死龜龜
還一直死守著龜屁不放且絕不超車的有品駕駛

mikkle wrote:
就說後霧燈是裝在駕駛...(恕刪)

後霧燈裝單側...是為了用不對稱來引起人潛意識的注意...把另外一邊也裝上

只是造成誤判與後方的痛苦而已...那種天氣好還開霧燈後霧燈耍帥的...真該

吊銷駕照重新考才對...只顧自己耍帥最不應該
mikkle wrote:
還有,就知道這種視線不良還找死超車的言論會出現
好啦,我知道你很有品
當大霧中遇到死龜龜
還一直死守著龜屁不放且絕不超車的有品駕駛

太激動了吧你

我一直很沒品阿,
嘴砲特別沒品,

而且
後霧燈方位跟超車這兩者我還是看不出有任何關係,
你說的那個論點,
聽起來像鬼扯,沒有依據。
練練習習嘴嘴砲砲 wrote:
來源: http:/...(恕刪)

後霧燈的規範在練大的#23有寫得很清楚(這應該是歐洲的)
單邊或兩邊都被允許
單邊放在駕駛側是可以讓後方駕駛可最清楚看見
但也沒有強制吧
我沒看到其他理由?(可能我英文差)

如果單邊後霧燈有較安全不易誤認甚至超車方便的絕對好處
那我想法規上絕對就直接反應
知道那些好處的出處或研究真要麻煩提供一下?!
還是那些說法大多是聽來的或想到的?

雙邊後霧燈確實有機會被誤認
所以法規上會規定和後煞車燈的距離
有第三後煞車燈應該和後霧燈誤認機會應該更少
而後霧燈和後燈在亮度上有差異

後霧燈配置之前就有討論
一個蠻有可能的原因
就是省成本
一邊倒車燈一邊裝後霧燈!
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!