個人積分：17317分
文章編號：84937143
個人積分：101分
文章編號：84937319
個人積分：4840分
文章編號：84938088
autofans wrote:
這等豐功偉業是否可讓吾人欣賞一下？
除了樓主的敘述外，請問還有何處可以看到？
豐功偉業談不上， 完整經過如此網頁，
https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=638&t=6228905
只是想到當財訊執事向謝某報告此事及「Project Syndicate回信表示，財訊已致歉並日後將使用正確的字眼」，謝某的反應是否鐵青墨綠，以下摘錄Project Syndicate致函筆者信件，
Dear A,
Thanks for your message. We have already taken this up with Wealth Magazine and they apologised and will use the correct phrasing moving forward.
I did however notice that most media in Taiwan (non-partners of PS) are using this incorrect term. So it seems like a Taiwan-wide problem.
Anyway, thanks for your interest in Project Syndicate and glad we were able to rectify this particular issue.
Kind Wishes,
Christianna Polydorou | Global Relations Manager |
Jonathan R. Hoffmann Project Syndicate Chief Operating Officer函告Christianna Polydorou Global Relations Manager 信件，「We made our position with them clear and our request to avoid using pejorative terms to refer to COVID-19 in licensed Project Syndicate commentaries was unequivocal as it is a betrayal of the original texts. That said, we are not responsible for Wealth’s editorial decisions, nor their capacity to apologize in a manner you deem acceptable.」，措詞強烈指控「已向財訊明確表示立場，並要求該刊本媒體授權的評論有關COVID-19不得使用貶損的字眼不容含混，因為這樣背叛了原文，」
「 it is a betrayal of the original texts」這是極嚴重的指控，財訊丟臉至極，財訊丟臉至極，財訊丟臉至極。
個人積分：2171分
文章編號：84939892
個人積分：5089分
文章編號：84939971
個人積分：4840分
文章編號：84942164
個人積分：789分
文章編號：84944269
個人積分：4840分
文章編號：84944484
個人積分：1101分
文章編號：84944663
個人積分：5000分
文章編號：84944710
關閉廣告