meaning55 wrote:
希望你看的懂
1985年出版的Legal research in the United Kingdom 1905-1984 : a classified list of legal theses and dissertations successfully completed for postgraduate degrees awarded by universities and polytechnics in the United Kingdom from 1905-1984
不就包含碩士和博士學位嗎?
怎麼看都找不到有【Postgraduate Diploma/Certificate】的字眼
況且裡面的論文分類清單也寫很清楚
1313. TSAI I W London LSE PhD Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions
不就證明她拿的是博士學位了嗎?
這本是1985年出版的書,不是201X年出版的;
蔡的論文分類號碼是1313,前面有1312後面有1314
代表不是201X年才把蔡的論文從中插入
這些資料都這麼明確,怎還會有人隨人起舞呢?
https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20190926000871-260407?chdtv
http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3976/
人中出呂布 馬中出赤兔
meaning55 wrote:
從來沒有人懷疑書目,只是 .... 書呢?
你既然講從來沒有人懷疑書目
代表你認為「1313. TSAI I W London LSE PhD Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions 」是真的!?
看起來你們真的只剩下「把正本論文拿出來,拿不出來就是假學歷」這一招耶
建議你們以後乾脆看誰不爽
直接去圖書館把那人的正本論文借閱後搞遺失
之後那位被偷正本論文的人,就可以被你們說是假碩士或假博士
因為圖書館已經沒有正本論文了
後續即使學校出來證明學位和論文都是真的,也會被你們說成袒護或是買通
這樣不是比較快嗎?還搞什麼罷免
此外當初有沒有繳交論文,LSE講很清楚了,裝睡的人叫不醒啊
http://www.lse.ac.uk/News/Latest-news-from-LSE/2019/j-October-2019/LSE-statement-on-PhD-of-Dr-Tsai-Ing-wen
All degrees from that period were awarded via the University of London and the thesis would have been sent first to their Senate House Library.
The Senate House Library records confirm that a copy was received and sent by them to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (IALS). There is a listing of Dr Tsai’s thesis ‘Unfair trade practices and safeguard actions’ in the IALS index document “Legal Research in the United Kingdom 1905-1984”, which was published in 1985.
人中出呂布 馬中出赤兔
關閉廣告