axlnslash wrote:
雖然最近內湖廠事件鬧...(恕刪)
這個報告的亮點應該是....韓系車分別在豪華品牌(Genesis)跟一般品牌(Kia)拿下品牌首獎了!!
pohsuan wrote:
這個報告的亮點應該是...(恕刪)

韓國車在歐美市場真的頗受好評;而且這份報告跟台灣人的傳統認知有差異;


我還滿相信消費者報告的,ptt上的車版有人提到消費者報告是唯一不登任何廣告、不接受廠商贊助的汽車測評;這份報告也顯示出汽車的品質是一直在演化的,沒有什麼品牌一定一直好或一直差的。
請問CR是用什麼方法做調查的? 對象是誰? 車主還是訂雜誌的讀者? 如果是車主他是怎麼拿到車主資料的? 台灣人要養成凡事求證, 與獨立思考判斷的能力, 不要人云亦云!
不先Google一下 就來質疑消費者報告的公正性

Consumer Reports' Car Reliability FAQ

這句我真的認同啦 不要在那邊整天聽朋友聽修車廠老闆說還有網路上看來的
linchinkuo wrote:
台灣人要養成凡事求證, 與獨立思考判斷的能力, 不要人云亦云!..(恕刪)
Where Is the Data From?
Consumer Reports obtains its reliability data from an "Annual Questionnaire that is sent to subscribers to CR.org and Consumer Reports magazine". 所以呢, 真正的車主有多少? 看來一大部分是讀者!

會在網路爆料的是誰? 滿意的多還是不滿意的多? 誰會希望車子賣的不好? 誰會希望車子賣的好? 答案已經很清楚!
axlnslash wrote:
雖然最近內湖廠事件鬧...(恕刪)



現在各廠出的每台都是好車!各有需求的消費者在
問題是,買車只是買「車」嗎?後勤不重要?服務不重要?這種價位的車,服務更是重要吧⋯⋯
太經典了

linchinkuo wrote:
Where Is the Data From?
Consumer Reports obtains its reliability data from an "Annual Questionnaire that is sent to subscribers to CR.org and Consumer Reports magazine". 所以呢, 真正的車主有多少? 看來一大部分是讀者!

會在網路爆料的是誰? 滿意的多還是不滿意的多? 誰會希望車子賣的不好? 誰會希望車子賣的好? 答案已經很清楚!...(恕刪)


整個FAQ解釋的都很清楚了如果你有完整看完的話

How Do You Know That Manufacturers Don't "Stuff the Ballot Box"?
In most other surveys that draw their samples from lists of registered car owners, the researcher can control who is mailed a survey. In the Consumer Reports survey, buying a subscription to either the magazine or to CR.org allows you to report on your experience with two cars. Some subscribers have wondered whether a manufacturer could just arrange to have their employees fill out questionnaires saying that their cars are reliable, as a way to influence our Ratings. Hypothetically, this is a potential weakness in our survey.
However, there are a number of ways that we can protect against this potential for fraud. For obvious reasons, we do not want to describe in detail the actions we take in this regard. We are confident that no manufacturer has succeeded.

給懶得看英文的
關閉廣告
文章分享
評分
評分
複製連結

今日熱門文章 網友點擊推薦!